Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) came up with the proposed
modifications earlier this year in August. They affect the doctors or their
practices in ways they are still trying to understand. However, P3 has gotten it
all figured out on behalf of providers for an efficient MIPS 2019 reporting
right away.
MIPS & MACRA are two significant terms when we talk about quality care. They are
the bedrock of the new system that we are trying to achieve. Moreover, the
Quality Payment Program under Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act
(MACRA) produces patient outcomes based on quality rather than quantity.
Now,
that you have an idea, we want to dive into the changes to this program before
2020 begins.
MIPS Requirements in 2020 – Threshold-wise
CMS
has revised the minimum and additional performance thresholds of the program.
The positive and negative payment adjustments have also been renewed. Since
physicians and physician groups have done so great in this program until now,
we can expect them to avoid penalties easily in MIPS 2019 by a distance.
Additionally,
the average MIPS score is expected to remain above 74 points which is far
beyond the minimum threshold score of 45. The organizations to cross that
benchmark are expected to increase, therefore, the bonus amount per clinician
will be smaller this year.
Promoting Interoperability (PI) Takes All the Attention
Prior
meaningful use (MU) and current promoting interoperability (PI) have gotten the
most attention in 2019. It is one of the major performance categories of MIPS
2019, thus requires a thorough understanding. Some of the measures such as
sharing patient education and keeping a secure line of communication with them
are removed. Previously, they had maximized a clinician’s score way above the
benchmark.
In
the best interest of clinicians, the removal of such measures was necessary to
deal with the burnout epidemic. For them to stay productive and intact with the
system, CMS removed bonus measures such as reporting on an improvement activity
related to Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (CEHRT). After such
detachments, the remaining measures have taken up more weight than usual. It
continues to suggest that physicians should have a categorical approach to this
category. That is where P3 comes in and expresses itself elaborately.
MIPS
in healthcare is mostly about health information exchange (HIX) in which a
patient’s data moves electronically across a provider’s network. Electronic
exchange of patient data is not only a MIPS requirement but the requirement of
regulatory authorities as well. For instance, small practices are required to
send and receive patient summaries via direct messaging.
Improvement Activities – Not So Far Behind
CMS
proposes the addition of two improvement activities and removal of 15 in MIPS
2020. As for those who have just joined us, improvement activities are MIPS
measures for this performance category.
Due
to these changes, the MIPS attestation process needs revision for practices in
2020, and it is where
P3
comes in, again, and leaves no room for ambiguities when it comes to medical
billing or MIPS consulting services.
As
a qualified registry for MIPS, to get you the right scores by choosing the
relevant MIPS quality measures to report is part of our job. Not only that but
to get you high scores, in the end, to increase your collections. After all,
every small effort we put into your MIPS 2019 reporting results in a smoother
workflow and better cashflow.
As
part of the big plan, practices have to ensure a higher level of participation
from now on since, in 2020, at least 50% of the providers in a group will have
to participate in an activity. Although practices may already be doing that, it
is a note for those organizations that are not fully participating in the level
that is required of them.
Quality Category Is Here Too – Be Aware of the Topped-Out Measures
Although
Quality has been the top category of the program, organizations still have room
for improvement in it. Beware of the topped-out measures which are those
measures in which everyone is performing well. CMS removes such measures in
four years, decreasing the number of points a practice can receive in it each
year until the measure is no more.
Hence,
if an organization is reporting on six MIPS quality measures and two of them
have topped-out, it will be harder to cross performance benchmarks. To select
the best six measures for your practice, it is wise to use the benchmarkingtool by CMS. It is a useful tool when it comes to checking the score and
measures that need to be revised.
P3Care supports providers by reviewing the benchmarking report on their behalf and
scoring against the best possible measures.